Kajian Hukum Praktik Kedokteran Pemeriksaan Selaput Dara Dengan Metode Tes Dua Jari

Authors

  • Purwanto Panji Sasongko Universitas Pertahanan RI
  • Diah Arimbi Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59585/bajik.v3i2.612

Keywords:

Legal Studies, Medical Practice, Hymen Examination, Two-Finger Test Method

Abstract

Patients have the right to accept and refuse treatment, and the right to receive information from their doctor before giving Consent to Medical Action. Patients have the right to self-determination as a basis for human rights, and the right to information owned by the patient about their illness and what medical action is to be performed on them. To find out the hymen examination carried out by medical personnel or health workers who meet the principles of propriety and do not violate professional ethics. The research method used in this study is in accordance with normative juridical supported by prescriptives related to the protection of women's human rights against medical actions regarding hymen examination using the 'two-finger' test method. The results of the study on secondary data (primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials), then obtained on the technical implementation of the examination contained in the Standard Operating Procedure Guidelines for the Implementation of Minimum Service Standards (SPM) in the Field of Integrated Services for Women and Children Victims of Violence. The conclusion is that hymen examination using the 'two finger' test method is very contrary to the law, both in terms of the Medical Practice Law, contrary to the medical code of ethics, contrary to the regulations of the Minister of Health, contrary to Human Rights and contrary to the recommendations of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Author Biographies

Purwanto Panji Sasongko, Universitas Pertahanan RI

Program Studi Kedokteran

Diah Arimbi, Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer

Program Studi Magister Hukum Kesehatan

References

BUKU-BUKU

Budiyanto Arif. Et al. Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik. Cet.2. Jakarta: UI Press,1997.

Desriza Ratman. Aspek Hukum Informed Consent dan Rekam Medis Dalam Transaksi Terapeutik. Cet.2. Bandung: Keni Media, 2018.

Dolinak David. Forensic pathology principles and practice. Elsevier. Sexual Battery Investigation. Elsevier. 2005. 468-484.

Gonzales A. Thomas. Legal Medicine Pathology and Toxicology. Virginity.Rape and other Sexual Assault. 2nd edition. New York: Appleton, 1954.

Hanafiah Jusuf, M dan Amri Amir. Etika Kedokteran dan Hukum Kesehatan.EGC. Ed 1. Jakarta: EGC, 2009.

Luhulima Sudirta. Achie Bahan Ajar Tentang Hak Perempuan. Ed.1. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor, 2007.

Nanda Yunisa. Undang-Undang R.I. No.23 Tahun 2004 Tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga.Jakarta: Permata Press.2015.

Philipus M. Hadjon. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu,1987.

Raharjo Satjipto. Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000.

Soekanto Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: PT. rajagrafindo Persada, 2001.

Soetandyo. Wignyosoebroto. Satjipto rahardjo dan hukum progresif urgensi dan kritik. Jakarta: epistema institute, 2011.

Wiradharma Danny. Penuntun Kuliah Hukum kedokteran. Jakarta: PT. Binarupa Aksara, 1996.

WHO. Guidelines for Medico-Legal.Care for Victims of Sexual Violence. 2003.

WHO. A Clinical Handbook. Health care for women subjected to intimate partner violence or sexual violence. Luxembourg, 2014.

WHO. Eliminating Virginity Testing: An Interagency Statement. Geneva.2018.

B. MAJALAH ILMIAH/JURNAL

Amalia, Syarah. “Tes keperawanan bagi calon istri anggota tni ditinjau dari undang-undang hak asasi manusia nomor 39 tahun 1999 dan Maslahah Al-Mursalah.” Undergraduate thesis. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 2018.

Fadli Andi. Perlindungan Ham dalam perspektif Negara Hukum Indonesia.vol.19.2019.hlm.148-150

Independent Forensic Expert Group. Statement on Virginity Testing. Vol.25. No.1. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 2015.

Krishan Vij,Textbook of Forensic and Medicine and Toxicology.Medicolegal Examination of the Living. fourth edition. Elsevier. 2008.

Lamonti, Erinda dan Diah Ayu Utami. Kepatutan Tes keperawanan Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia.vol.1.no.2. Jurnal IJCCS, 2018.

Prosedur Standar Operasional Pelaksanaan Standar pelayanan Minimal (SPM). Bidang Layanan Terpadu Bagi Perempuan dan Anak Korban Kekerasan. Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Republik Indonesia, 2010.

Sahya Anggara. Teori keadilan John Rawls kritik terhadap demokrasi liberal.vol.1.2013.hlm.1-4.

C. PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Hak asasi Manusia, UU No. 39 Tahun 1999, LN. No. 165 Tahun 1999 , TLN No.3886.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Praktik Kedokteran, UU No. 29 Tahun 2004, LN. No.116 Tahun 2004, TLN No. 4431.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Kesehatan, UU No. 36 Tahun 2009, LN No. 144 Tahun 2009, TLN No.5063.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Tenaga Kesehatan. UU No. 36 Tahun 2014, LN No. 298 Tahun 2014, TLN No. 5067.

Kementerian Kesehatan. Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan tentang Persetujuan Tindakan Kedokteran. Permenkes No. 290 Tahun 2008.

Mahkamah Agung. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung tentang Pedoman mengadili perkara perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum. Perma No. 3 Tahun 2017.

Kementerian pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak. Peraturan Menteri Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Anak tentang Sistem Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak. Permen PP No. 6 Tahun 2015.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-20

How to Cite

Sasongko, P. P., & Arimbi, D. (2025). Kajian Hukum Praktik Kedokteran Pemeriksaan Selaput Dara Dengan Metode Tes Dua Jari. Barongko: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan, 3(2), 376–388. https://doi.org/10.59585/bajik.v3i2.612