The Indonesian Version of the Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI) was tested for reliability and validity in type 2 diabetes patients

Authors

  • Anih Kurnia Lincoln University Colledge, Malaysia
  • Farida Mohd Said Lincoln University College, Malaysia
  • Santhna Letchmi Paduragan Lincoln University College, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59585/ijhs.v2i1.336

Keywords:

Translation, Validity And Reliability, Diabetes, Self-Care Management, Assessment Instruments, SCPI

Abstract

Although several diabetes self-care management tools have been created, very few provide preparation for diabetes self-care behavior management. Three essential components of diabetes self-care management are measured by the assessment tool "Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (LMC) (SCPI)": Knowledge of skills, Confidence in one's ability to use skills, and Readiness to put skills into practice. This study aims to validate, translate, and adapt the SCPI for usage with Indonesian adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods: The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Evidence Based Medicine Committee (AAOS) criteria for modifying the scale were adhered to in this study. Evaluate average variance, Cronbach alpha, and composite reliability to test validity and reliability. Specifically, determinant coefficient testing and model appropriateness testing are used to assess goodness of fit. Examine the valid R-squared statistical value for every relationship to determine the test. If the p-value is less than 0.05, then there is a direct and indirect association to be seen if the variable is significant  Result:  Cronbach's alpha > 0.60 indicates strong internal consistency for the Indonesian SCPI version or I-SCPI. For every variable, the AVE value is larger than 0.50, while the CR value exceeds 0.70. This indicates that all legitimate indicators converge to form the variables for which they are intended. The R-Square values of 0.312 and 0.536 for the variables of preparedness and confidence are used to calculate the degree of good fit. This number indicates that the Preparedness variable is only partially explained by the Confidence and Preparedness variables (5.36%), with other variables accounting for the remaining 94.64%. Furthermore, the Skill/Knowledge, Confidence, and Preparedness factors account for only 3% of the variance in the Confidence variable, with the remaining 97% explained by variables outside the model. Conclusion: We developed an Indonesian version of SCPI through cross-cultural translation and adaption. The I-SCPI is reliable and valid for assessing the level of self-management in type 2 diabetes patients in Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anih Kurnia, Lincoln University Colledge, Malaysia

Student  Doctoral Program Study, Faculty of Nursing

Diploma  Nursing study program, Faculty of  Health Science, Bakti Tunas Husada University, Tasikmalaya, West Java, Indonesia

Farida Mohd Said, Lincoln University College, Malaysia

Department of Medical Health, Doctoral Program Study, Faculty of Nursing

Santhna Letchmi Paduragan, Lincoln University College, Malaysia

Department of Medical Health, Doctoral Program Study, Faculty of Nursing

References

Agidew, E., Wale, M. Z., Kerebih, H., Yirsaw, M. T., Zewdie, T. H., Girma, M., & Miskir, A. (2021). Adherence to diabetes self-care management and associated factors among people with diabetes in Gamo Gofa Zone public health hospitals. SAGE Open Medicine, 9, 205031212110539. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211053953

American Association Diabetes and Edukator. (2020). An Effective Model of Diabetes Care and Education: Revising the AADE7 Self-Care Behaviors®. Diabetes Educator, 46(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721719894903

Aronson, R., Brown, R. E., Jiandani, D., Walker, A., & Orzech, N. (2017). Assessment of self-management in patients with diabetes using the novel LMC Skills , Confidence and Preparedness Index ( SCPI ). Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 137, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.028

Aronson, R., Brown, R. E., Jiandani, D., Walker, A., Orzech, N., & Mbuagbaw, L. (2018). Assessment of self-management in patients with diabetes using the novel LMC Skills, Confidence and Preparedness Index (SCPI). Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 137, 128–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2017.10.028

Aronson, R., Li, A., Brown, R. E., Walker, A., Lyons, A., & Orzech, N. (2019). Optimizing diabetes selfmanagement using the Novel Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI). Diabetes Care, 42(10), 1873–1878. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0699

Asmat, K. (2024). A Patient-Centered Self-Management Intervention to Improve Glycemic Control , Self-Efficacy and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus : A SPIRIT Compliant Study Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trial S T U DY P R OT O C O L A Patie. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity, 16, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S385715

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Adv. Behav,Res.Ther, 71(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400259303

Batalha, A. P. D. B., Ponciano, I. C., Chaves, G., Felício, D. C., Britto, R. R., & da Silva, L. P. (2021). Behavior change interventions in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of the effects on self-management and A1c. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, 20(2), 1815–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-021-00846-8

Beaton, D. E., Boers, M., & Wells, G. A. (2002). Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 14(2), 109–114.

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.

Beatson E Dorcas, Bombardier Claire, G. F. and F. B. M. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1080/000163599428823

Campbell, J. A., Walker, R. J., Smalls, B. L., Davis, K. S., & Egede, L. E. (2012). Diabetes Empowerment , Medication Adherence and Self-Care Behaviors in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Doiabetes Technology & Teurapeutik, 14(7), 630–634. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2011.0287

Charron-Prochownik, D., Zgibor, J. C., Peyrot, M., Peeples, M., McWilliams, J., Koshinsky, J., Noullet, W., & Siminerio, L. M. (2007). The Diabetes Self-management Assessment Report Tool (D-SMART®): Process evaluation and patient satisfaction. Diabetes Educator, 33(5), 833–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721707307613

Cheng, A. Y. Y. (2013). Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Journal of Diabetes, 37(SUPPL.1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.01.009

Fitzgerald JT, Davis WK, Connell CM, Hess GE, Funnell MM, H. R. (1998). Development and Validation of The Diabetes Care Profile. Small Group Research, 29 no. 5, 583–601.

Hermanns, N., Laffel, L., Ehrmann, D., Kulzer, B., & Schmitt, A. (2022). Coordination of glucose monitoring , self-care behaviour and mental health : achieving precision monitoring in diabetes. 1883–1894.

Hu, J., Amirehsani, K. A., McCoy, T. P., Wallace, D. C., Coley, S. L., & Zhan, F. (2020). Reliability and Validity of the Spoken Knowledge in Low Literacy in Diabetes in Measuring Diabetes Knowledge Among Hispanics With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Educator, 46(5), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721720941409

International Diabetes Federation. (2021). International Diabetes Federation. In Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (10 edition, Vol. 102, Issue 2). IDF Diabetes Atlas 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2013.10.013

Juarez, L. D., Presley, C. A., Howell, C. R., Agne, A. A., & Cherrington, A. L. (2022). The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Association Between Diabetes Education and Support and Self-Care Management. Health Education and Behavior, 49(4), 689–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981211008819

Kamradt, M., Bozorgmehr, K., Krisam, J., Freund, T., Kiel, M., Qreini, M., Flum, E., Berger, S., Besier, W., Szecsenyi, J., & Ose, D. (2014). Assessing self-management in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in Germany: Validation of a German version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA-G). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-014-0185-1

Kiehn, O., & Car. (2017). A High Level of Patient Activation Is Observed But Unrelated to Glycemic Control Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Robert. Physiology & Behavior, 176(3), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.2337/diaspect.23.3.171.A

Kugai, H., Igarashi, A., Anezaki, S., Fukui, C., Saito, N., Hamasaki, Y., & Yamamoto-Mitani, N. (2023). Components of peritonitis preventive self-care education programs associated with self-care knowledge and behavior among patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis in Japan: a cross-sectional study. Renal Replacement Therapy, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-023-00489-w

Kwok, C., Fethney, J., & White, K. (2012). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Chinese breast cancer screening beliefs questionnaire. Cancer Nursing, 35(6), 429–437.

Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220.

Li, W., Sun, L., Li, G., & Xiao, S. (2019). Prevalence , Influence Factors and Cognitive Characteristics of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 11(July), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00180

Lightfoot, C. J., Nair, D., Bennett, P. N., Smith, A. C., Griffin, A. D., Warren, M., & Wilkinson, T. J. (2022). Patient Activation: The Cornerstone of Effective Self-Management in Chronic Kidney Disease? Kidney and Dialysis, 2(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.3390/kidneydial2010012

Liu, X., Dai, L., Chen, B., Feng, N., Wu, Q., Lin, Y., Zhang, L., Tan, D., Zhang, J., Tu, H., Li, C., & Wang, W. (2016). [Evaluation on the validity and reliability of the Diabetes Self-management Knowledge, Attitude, and Behavior Assessment Scale (DSKAB)]. Zhonghua yu fang yi xue za zhi [Chinese journal of preventive medicine], 50(1), 56–60. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-9624.2016.01.010

Lukman, N. A., Leibing, A., & Merry, L. (2020). Self-Care Experiences of Adults with Chronic Disease in Indonesia: An Integrative Review. International Journal of Chronic Diseases, 2020, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1379547

Machado, C. C. da S., Malaguti, C., Trevizan, P. F., Ezequiel, D. G. A., Seixas, M. B., & da Silva, L. P. (2020). Psychometric validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of Bandura’s exercise self-efficacy scale in diabetes patients. Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders, 19(2), 925–932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00581-6

Mbuagbaw, L., Aronson, R., Walker, A., Brown, R. E., & Orzech, N. (2017). The LMC Skills , Confidence & Preparedness Index ( SCPI ): development and evaluation of a novel tool for assessing self-management in patients with diabetes. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0606-z

Modarresi et al. (2020). Relationship between Self Care Management with Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. International Journal of Preventive Medicine, 8(11:127), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM

Paudel, G., Dahal, K., Biswas, T., & Sugishita, T. (2022). Self-care behaviours among people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in South Asia : A systematic review and meta-analysis. 12. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.12.04056

Riegel, B., Dunbar, S. B., Fitzsimons, D., Freedland, K. E., Lee, C. S., Middleton, S., Stromberg, A., Vellone, E., Webber, D. E., & Jaarsma, T. (2021). Self-care research: Where are we now? Where are we going? International Journal of Nursing Studies, 116, 103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103402

Sigurdardottir, A. K., & Benediktsson, R. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Icelandic version of the problem area in diabetes (PAID) scale. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(4), 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.10.008

Sloan, J., Symonds, T., Vargas-Chanes, D., & Fridley, B. (2003). Practical guidelines for assessing the clinical significance of health-related quality of life changes within clinical trials. Drug Information Journal, 37(1), 23–31.

Society, C. D. (2018). Guidelines for the prevention and control of type 2 diabetes in China (2017 Edition). Chinese Journal of Practical Internal Medicine, 38(4), 292–344.

Supramaniam, P., binti Ali, A., Li Yun, C., Pei Yi, C., binti Shaari, A., binti Kamaruzaman, N. H., Jia Yi, S., Keat Ming, T., Yuan Liang, W., & Pei Wen, Y. (2019). Reliability and validity of Beliefs on Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ) in diabetes mellitus patients: Malay Translated Version. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 9(2), p8609. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.9.02.2019.p8609

Vincze, A., Losonczi, A., & Stauder, A. (2020). The validity of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) in Hungarian patients with type 2 diabetes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01595-7

Wang, H., Li, D., Xiong, Y., Huang, H., Hu, Q., & Zhang, W. (2022). Effect of Cross Theoritical Model of Behavior Change and Motivation Interview on Self-Management Behaviour. Journal of Oncology, 2022.

Wang, X., Lyu, W., Aronson, R., Li, A., Lu, G., Xu, W., Cao, Y., Yu, Y., Wang, L., & Lin, H. (2021). Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the LMC Skills, Confidence & Preparedness Index (SCPI) in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01664-x

Downloads

Published

2024-03-31

How to Cite

Kurnia, A., Said, F. M., & Paduragan, S. L. (2024). The Indonesian Version of the Skills, Confidence, and Preparedness Index (SCPI) was tested for reliability and validity in type 2 diabetes patients . International Journal of Health Sciences, 2(1), 472–494. https://doi.org/10.59585/ijhs.v2i1.336