The Influence of Ecological Knowledge And Locus of Control Over Pro-Environmental Student Behavior In The Urban Area of Makassar

Authors

  • Risa Bernadip Umar University of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59585/ijhs.v3i4.1079

Keywords:

Ecological Knowledge, Locus of Control, Pro-Environmental Behavior, Students

Abstract

Environmentally conscious or pro- environmental behavior Behavior is an important factor in maintaining environmental sustainability in urban areas. Students, as the younger generation, have a strategic role in shaping environmentally friendly behavior. Ecological knowledge and psychological factors such as locus of control of control is thought to influence this behavior. This study aims to analyze the influence of ecological knowledge and locus of control. of control over pro- environmental This study investigated student behavior in the urban area of Makassar. The study used a quantitative design with a cross-sectional approach. The study sample of 120 high school students was selected using a stratified sampling technique. random sampling. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results showed that ecological knowledge (β = 0.41; p < 0.001) and locus of control (β = 0.36; p < 0.001) has a significant effect on pro- environmental Behavior. Simultaneously, these two variables explain 48% of the variation in students' environmentally conscious behavior. It was concluded that increasing ecological knowledge and strengthening internal self-control can improve environmentally friendly behavior in students in urban areas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Risa Bernadip Umar, University of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Mechanical Engineering Study Program

References

Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behavior Hum Decis Process. 1991.

Bamberg S, Möser G. Twenty years after Hines. J Environ Psychol. 2007.

Clayton S. Environmental identity. J Environ Psychol. 2003.

Gifford R. Environmental psychology matters. Annu Rev Psychol. 2014.

Hines JM. Responsible environmental behavior. J Environ Education. 1987.

Harfika, M., Jukarnain, J., Nurhaedah, N., & Nursinah, N. (2025). Health Sociology in Practice: Training and Counseling on Lifestyle Changes to Reduce the Risk of Gout in the Elderly Community of Village B in 2025. Sahabat Sosial: Journal of Community Service, 4 (1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.59585/sosisabdimas.v4i1.876

Hungerford HR. Environmental education research. J Environ Educ. 2010.

Kaiser FG. Ecological behavior. J Environ Psychol. 1999.

Kollmuss A. Mind the gap. Environment Education Res. 2002.

Lee K. Environmental education. Int J Sci Educ. 2008.

Notoatmodjo S. Health Promotion. Jakarta; 2020.

Pannyiwi, R., Azis, MNSA, & Rahmat, RA (2025). Analysis of Nurses' Obstacles in Implementing Therapeutic Communication in Healthcare Environments. Barongko: Journal of Health Sciences, 4 (1), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.59585/bajik.v4i1.921

Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control. Psychol Monogr. 1966.

Steg L. Encouraging pro- environmental behavior. J Environ Psychol. 2014.

Stern PC. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues. 2000.

Umar, R.B., B, M., A, A., & Rizki, Z. (2024). TheEnvironmental Degradation on Human Health and Welfare. International Journal of Health Sciences, 2 (2), 705–715. https://doi.org/10.59585/ijhs.v2i2.367

UNESCO Education for sustainable development. Paris; 2017.

WHO. Environmental health guidelines. Geneva; 2021.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Umar, R. B. (2025). The Influence of Ecological Knowledge And Locus of Control Over Pro-Environmental Student Behavior In The Urban Area of Makassar. International Journal of Health Sciences, 3(4), 1002–1007. https://doi.org/10.59585/ijhs.v3i4.1079